Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Amazingly CPC Defend Post Election Violence Murder, Says Those Murdered Were "Professionals" Not "Corpers"!


Amazingly CPC Defend Post Election Violence Murder, Says Those Murdered Were "Professionals" Not "Corpers"!

Written by Alaba Johnson on 01 January 2013.
Amazingly CPC Defend Post Election Violence Murder, Says Those Murdered Were "Professionals" Not "Corpers"!
alt
The Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) has come out to defend the post election murders that occurred after the 2011 elections saying that those who were murdered were not all Corpers but were IT Professionals who may have had sympathy for the rival People's Democratic Party.
Amazingly this near confession was caught on tape in an interview granted by the CPC's National Publicity Secretary, Rotimi Fashakin, who said that his party even traced one of those murdered via his facebook and established that he was an IT professional not a Corper.
But what Fashakin failed to tell Nigerians is that the murder of these youths was not justified if even they were not Corpers.
Fashakin also failed to tell Nigerians why the CPC's lawyers in Kaduna bailed out 600 of those arrested on connection with the post election violence as reported by the Vanguard of May 23rd 2011 ( Read Here )
Speaking in the interview, Fashakin said  "some so called (NYSC) members were murdered, but in actual fact some of these people are IT consultants."
He then went on to claim that his party investigated one of those murdered by tracing his facebook profile in his words they discovered that "he graduated from UNN in 2006 where he studied computer science and is also a manager at a computer firm in Lagos.”
But Fashakin betrayed his ignorance of facebook by the statement. Facebook's programme is many atimes formatted to list one's year of matriculation (year of entry) as one's year of graduation. Many readers who use facebook would realize this as it may have happened to them.
Also, many people don't like to leave their employment status as unemployed and so boost it by adding places where they may have worked in the past either as holiday jobs or in their parents firm and it is not good judgment to take the  employment status on facebook as fact.

Post-election violence: CPC effects bail of 600 suspects in Kaduna


on MAY 23, 2011 · in NEWS

4:19 pm
  
By  Luka Binniyat
KADUNA – Six weeks after their arrest and detention over alleged involvement in the violence that engulfed parts of Kaduna  following the release of the last presidential election results, the  Congress for progressive Change, CPC,  in Kaduna state,  yesterday,  said it has so far secured the bail of over 600 suspects.
The CPC said it is still working to secure bail for more, saying it was all on compassionate grounds and in the spirit of oneness, since not all who breathed freedom were CPC members.
The CPC State Party Chairman, Alhaji Ahmadu Yaro disclosed this while briefing newsmen in Kaduna .
In spite of the high number of CPC supporters arrested during the crisis,  Yaro , denied the allegations that members of his party were responsible for the post election violence, putting the blame on supposed aggrieved PDP members who lost at the party’s primaries.
File photo: Protesters during the post-election riots in Kaduna
“It was PDP members who were fighting each other as a result of the fall-out of the primaries. It was a crisis within the PDP that caused the vilence, many of their members were not happy, that was why they started the crisis it was not CPC”, he said.
“The violence was erroneously linked with CPC. The police arrested people all over the state in connection to the violence not because they had any connection to CPC.
“Most of those arrested shortly after the post election violence were mostly CPC members but their arrest was done in error while the allegation against them is false and baseless.”
“The violence did not start from the CPC, it started as a result of people’s anger with the leadership of the country. The people were angry because of government’s failure to give them what they want. So they decided to protest to show the government that they are doing badly.”
“They want to blackmail CPC that was why they said it was CPC that started the violent protest, they saw that CPC was about taking over the government and they don’t want the CPC to win. For instance, there has never been an election in Nigeria where Army or Police attacked people like the recent elections. So that’s why they moved the military against the party because they don’t want CPC to win,” he alleged.

Monday, January 7, 2013

Sokoto is Poorest State in Nigeria


07 Jan 2013

Font Size: a / A
Sokoto-state-0713.jpg-Sokoto-state-0713.jpg
Sokoto state
The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) at the weekend said Sokoto State is the poorest state in the country.
According to information obtained on NBS website by an online agency, The Citizen Platform, the state has 81.2 per cent poverty rate.

The information disclosed that other states on the list include Katsina, 74.5 per cent; Adamawa, 74.2 per cent; Gombe, 74.2 per cent; Jigawa, 74.1 per cent; Plateau, 74.1 per cent; Ebonyi, 73.6 per cent; Bauchi, 73 per cent; Kebbi, 72 per cent and Zamfara, 70.8 per cent.

The state with the lowest poverty rate was Niger with 33.8 per cent, followed by Osun with 37.9 per cent and Ondo with 45.7 per cent.
Others include Bayelsa State with 47 per cent and Lagos State, 48.6 per cent.

The average poverty rate of the states in the North-west geopolitical zone remained the highest at 71.4 per cent followed by North-east 69.1 per cent and North-central, 60.7 per cent.

The record showed that poverty was least prevalent in the South-west, with an average of 49.8 per cent, followed by South-south, 55.5 per cent and South-east, 59.5 per cent. 

MASSOB Insists on Justice for the Apo Six


07 Jan 2013

Font Size: a / A
2708F01.Ralph-Uwazurike-R.jpg - 2708F01.Ralph-Uwazurike-R.jpg
MASSOB Leader, Mr. Ralph Uwazurike
By Christopher Isiguzo
If there was any needed example to prove that justice delayed is justice denied, it is in the case of the Apo Six, an appellation that has stuck to a group of Igbo that were unlawfully killed by the police in Abuja eight years ago.
Ifeanyi Ozo, Chinedu Meniru, Isaac Ekene, Paulinus Ogbonna, Anthony Nwokike and Augustina Arebun, all aged between 21 and 25 years, were murdered by the police on June 8, 2005 and nearly eight years after, their parents are still seeking justice.
The five young traders were murdered in cold blood in 2005 shortly after leaving Grand Mirage Hotel, Abuja where they went for a party. The sixth victim, Arebun, who visited her boyfriend, Uzor, had accompanied them to the outing. While the police shot the five boys dead, Arebun was strangled to death in a bid to stop her from contradicting the police version of the incident.
The incident sparked a two-day riot in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Not so much because the police killed the innocent young men and a lady, but more because of the careful scheme of the police to label the victims as armed robbers. The uproar had forced the then Inspector General of Police (IG), Tafa Balogun, to set up a panel of enquiry headed by Mike Okiro. Not sure what verdict the police panel will return, the then President Olusegun Obasanjo set up a Commission of Inquiry chaired by Justice Olasumbo Goodluck. Both the Okiro and Goodluck panels declared that the Apo Six were murdered innocently.
The commission besides clearing the victims of the allegation that they were armed robbers, recommended that the bodies of the deceased should be exhumed for proper burial, which should be funded by the Federal Government. It also recommended that the police officers who were behind the dastardly act should be prosecuted for multiple first degree murder.
In compliance with the recommendation of the commission, the Federal Government on December 4, 2005 gave the victims proper burial as their bodies were taken to their respective states having given each of the families N3 million, while the eight police officers involved in the act were charged to court for murder.
But eight years after, those responsible for their killings have not been brought to book. Their trial has witnessed many twists and turns.
For failing to deliver justice in the case, the leader of Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Mr. Ralph Uwazurike, has given the judiciary an ultimatum to ensure justice by the end of the year.
He threatened that if nothing was done by then, he would mobilise people to protest the undue delay in the case.
He issued the threat after the parents and relations of the victims sought his intervention as a last resort to entreat him to take up the “buried” case of their children.
Briefing journalists on the issue, Uwazurike said the parents and relations of the victims besieged his house in Owerri insisting that anything short of justice in the matter would not be acceptable to them.
He expressed dismay that eight years after the six persons were killed, nothing serious is being done to bring the culprits to justice. He therefore asked the Federal Government to initiate actions aimed at ensuring that the matter is ended before the end of this year, failing which he said he would mobilise his members to make the country “ungovernable”.
THISDAY checks revealed that the legal procedure has suffered so much manipulation aimed at stalling the trial. Although bail, for instance should not be granted to suspects in a murder case such as this, the trial judge, Justice Isyaku Bello, granted it. The prime suspect, Ibrahim Danjuma, a Deputy Commissioner of Police, had claimed that he was suffering from diabetes, ulcer and heart problem.
To further stall the case, the fifth accused policeman, Ezekiel Acheneje, seems to have perfected the act of hiring and firing  his lawyers so that the case can be adjourned as many times as possible, because the law requires that a murder suspect must be represented by a lawyer.
What is worse, the DPO of the Apo Police Station, Othman Abdulsalam, where the victims were killed, escaped from police custody since 2005 and has remained at large till today.
However, while other seven officers involved in the act have remained in prison custody since then, Danjuma who allegedly led others in shooting the six Apo traders secured bail since 2006. The case has since then been floundering under Justice Bello and has witnessed many adjournments.
Dismayed by the development, Uwazurike asked the Federal Government to ensure that the case is ended before the end of the year, noting that the unnecessary delay in the court process was making the relatives of the victims to begin to lose hope in the process and are accordingly suspecting “foul play along the line”.
He further asked Ndigbo all over the world to begin to observe June 8 every year with effect from 2013 as work-free day to mark the gruesome killing of the Igbo traders as well as the plethora of injustices being meted out against the Igbo before the international community.
He pointed out that, “Rev. King who killed one member of his church was sentenced to death within six months but policemen who killed six young Igbo traders are still there eight years after and even their ring leader is walking the streets having secured bail for first degree murder. I am interested in this case because of the injustices against our people in Nigeria. We have two types of laws in Nigeria, one for Igbo and one for others. Once it involves Igbo, we are doomed.  The DCP is roaming the streets as if nothing has happened; while others are in detention.
“It’s not a matter of compensation; it’s a matter that has to do with an Igbo man being killed like an animal in a country we jointly own. Someone killed six people and is roaming the streets. I want to say that Ndigbo will like to see the end of the case.”
Continuing, the MASSOB leader said: “If nothing happens by the end of the year in this matter, we’ll make the country ungovernable. We’ll tell them that Igbo man cannot be killed like chicken in Nigeria. We must follow this case to a logical conclusion. We know our people are being killed daily in the North, especially in the course of the Boko Haram upsurge, but if they are now making a concrete statement to the effect that our security is no more guaranteed, then we know what to do.”

2013 budget: The deal Jonathan made…Over constituency projects


 January 7, 2013 7 Comments »
2013 budget: The deal Jonathan made…Over constituency projects
From ADETUTU FOLASADE-KOYI, Abuja
Ashowdown is imminent between the Presidency and the National Assembly over the N100 billion constituency projects of federal lawmakers not incorporated in the 2013 Appropriation Bill. The projects are reportedly incorporated in the N1. 34 trillion capital projects of the 2012 budget. Daily Sun gathered that before the passage of the 2013 budget, there was a gentleman’s agreement between the National Assembly and the Presidency on the completion of constituency projects of federal lawmakers.
A senior federal lawmaker, who doesn’t want to be named, told Daily Sun that an agreement was struck with the Presidency that outstanding constituency projects would be completed within the 2012 budget, which ended on December 31.
“We had an understanding with the president that he would approve funds for the constituency projects and sign before the December 31, 2012 deadline,” the source said. But a counter-order, in the form of a circular, reportedly emanated from the Presidency, with the directive that all capital projects not completed before December 31, were statute-barred. A source on the Senate Appropriation Committee disclosed that federal lawmakers were in for a shocker in the New Year “because there was an agreement during the preparation of 2013 budget that the unreleased funds in the capital projects budget for 2012 would be extended till March 2013.
“We approved the new budget based on that agreement but when some of us approached some Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) during the holidays about our projects and when they would be completed, we were told that a circular emanated from the Presidency, which directed that all funds for capital projects left unexecuted by December 31, 2012 should revert to the treasury. “A minister confirmed the existence of the circular and as it stands now, most of my colleagues are unaware as they are out of Abuja on holiday.
Projects in my constituency that have been left undone since 2008 will not be completed even this year because they were incorporated in the 2012 budget. Most of us didn’t pursue incorporation of outstanding constituency projects in the 2013 budget because of the understanding we had that they would be competed with the 2012 budget.” Meanwhile, more facts emerged at the weekend on some factors, mitigating against presidential assent to the N4.987 2013 Appropriation Bill.
Daily Sun, however, learnt that the clean copy of the Bill was actually forwarded to President Goodluck Jonathan for assent by the close of work on December 21, 2012. But it went to the Presidency without accompanying details. A ranking Senator, who declined to be named because he was not authorised to do so, said: “It was not a deliberate error on the part of the National Assembly.” He offered more explanations: “We did send the 2013 budget to the president but it didn’t go with the details. We have now fine-tuned and worked out the details and by Tuesday, the final copy would have been concluded (and) the president should have the clean copy by Wednesday.
“Look, it’s nothing new that the details were not forwarded with the N4.987 trillion budget we passed on December 20. Remember that whenever the president submits the budget to a joint sitting of the National Assembly, it doesn’t come with the details. “He submits only the general principles and the details come later when the MDAs would show up before relevant committee to defend their budget estimates. The fine-tuning is going on as we speak. Late signing of the budget by the president will not affect the January-December fiscal calendar of the nation’s budget. We are committed to that and I believe so is the Presidency. On the hike of the oil benchmark from $75 to $79 in 2013 budget, the source said the “decision by the National Assembly is irreversible.”
He continues: “During consideration of the new budget, we told World Bank officials, who came to plead on behalf of the Presidency that we retain the $75 oil benchmark that there were other sources of income open to the Presidency, which are not even appropriated by the National Assembly. “The new oil benchmark of $79 is clearly implementable; it will not affect the implementation of the new budget,” he reiterated.
Presidential Adviser on National Assembly Matters, Senator Joy Emodi, explained last week that there was no friction between the National Assembly and President Jonathan. She confirmed that the signing of the budget was being delayed because the “details of the budget are usually very bulky. We need to get the details; once the details are sent to Mr. President, he will have to study it first as nobody will just expect him to sign.
They are just binding it.” The 2013 budget comprises N387,976,000,000 fund for statutory transfers, N591,764,000,000 for debt service, N2,386,024,770,349 for recurrent (non-debt) expenditure and N1,621,455,655,252 for capital expenditure.